Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutshot
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Marasmusine (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nutshot[edit]
- Nutshot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Dictionary definition which already exists in Wikitionary (contested PROD). — Tivedshambo (t/c) 05:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nonnotable neologism. Wikipedia is WP:NOT for terms made up while playing a video game one day. Edison (talk) 03:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in current state as an unverifiable neologism. Though an alternative might be to redirect to scrotum if we're talking about deez nutz. MuZemike 01:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete: Wikipedia is not for stuff WP:MADEUP one day, and even so, it's not a dictionary. There isn't really much to write about here besides a quick explanation of the word, and even then, it's not like it's a word that's had any mainstream coverage. Randomran (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Urban Dictionary is thataway. JuJube (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.